In a surprise development, Senate President Steve Sweeney announced
late yesterday that party chairs in seven counties spanning three Congressional
districts are endorsing State Senator Donald Norcross in the June primary. The unusual
united front appears to make Norcross the favorite to be the Democratic nominee
for Congress in the 1st, 3rd and 12th districts.
While Norcross had been widely considered likely to capture
the 1st district seat left open by the resignation of Rob Andrews, few
observers had given him much of a chance in the 3rd or the 12th
where Congressmen Jon Runyon and Rush Holt are not seeking re-election.
Sweeney told reporters that the Norcross unity ticket would
help the Democrats mount a more effective campaign to pick up the Runyon seat
while also holding the Andrews and Holt seats. “With New Jersey’s media market
being the way it is,” noted the Senate leader, “any advertising we aim at
Mercer or Middlesex Counties is also going to be seen by voters in Burlington,
Camden, Gloucester, Ocean and Somerset.” He added, “Why waste the voters’ time watching
ads for candidates they won’t find on their ballots?”
The announcement immediately raised cries of foul play from Democrats
who have been campaigning in the other two districts. Aimee Belgard, the
Burlington County Freeholder who until yesterday had been considered the
frontrunner in the 3rd, called the Sweeney statement “a heavy-handed
action that would ensure – whether by design or not – that New Jersey’s
delegation remains entirely male.”
Meanwhile, the three legislators running in the 12th,
while careful not to speak ill of Sweeney who many see as a possible candidate
for governor in 2017, were quick to criticize the plan. “I have no problem with
coordinated campaigns,” said Upendra Chivukula, the Somerset County Assemblyman,
“but when it is coordinated behind just one person, that is political bossism
at its worst.”
Bonnie Watson Coleman, the Assembly member from Mercer
County, agreed adding that, “This is exactly the type of abuse of power that
gave us Bridgegate and also is the kind of dual office holding New Jersey no
longer allows.”
That concern was echoed by the other legislator in the race,
State Senator Linda Greenstein, who said to a hastily assembled crowd of
supporters that, “Actually, it was my bill back in 2007 that made dual
office-holding illegal in New Jersey. As a lawyer”, she added, “I can tell you
this law applies just as much to jobs in Washington as it does to those based
in Trenton.”
The validity of the charge by Watson Coleman and Greenstein
was not immediately clear with longtime political observers offering a variety
of views. Interviewed on NJTV News, Brigid Harrison from Montclair University
said, “Bonnie and Linda may have a good point on the dual office holding
prohibition,” but Jeff Tittel of the Sierra Club issued a press release saying
that he would need time to determine Norcross’ view on the Keystone pipeline
before endorsing “any one or more” candidates.
Most state officials were unavailable for comment but Joe
Donahue, deputy director of the Election Law Enforcement Commission, agreed that
New Jersey law definitely restricts people from holding two different offices.
He cautioned, however, that the statute may not necessarily apply to someone
holding three offices, particularly if they are “essentially the same post.” Noting his previous experience as a
journalist, Donahue cautioned, “Even in New Jersey, I have never seen the word ‘dual’
used to mean three.”
No comments:
Post a Comment